Search found 12 matches

by xtian
Sun Oct 05, 2014 8:31 pm
Forum: Help Forum
Topic: Mudlet + utf8?
Replies: 6
Views: 2435

Re: Mudlet + utf8?

as a side-note: Mushclient just implemented utf8 (from server), too and at avalon.mud.de we are interested in using it for pseudo-graphics (lines and icons).
by xtian
Sat Sep 21, 2013 7:50 am
Forum: Mudlet Development
Topic: Mac Retina users needed
Replies: 12
Views: 6613

Re: Mac Retina users needed

anything special you need us to test?
by xtian
Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:04 pm
Forum: Mudlet Development
Topic: General ATCP question: is there a limit to telnet neg length
Replies: 9
Views: 2442

General ATCP question: is there a limit to telnet neg length

Hello everybody, Zesstra@MG stumbled over the mudstandards.org documentation of ATCP. In http://mudstandards.org/ATCP_Message_Format it is stated that messages sent to the server may not exceed 2048 bytes. This doesn't make any sense. Texts sent via the ATCP composer message will very likely exceed ...
by xtian
Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:13 pm
Forum: Help Forum
Topic: Special characters
Replies: 16
Views: 5822

Re: Special characters

Oh joy! I've been trying to get client developers to think in the direction of auto-plugin-donwloads or generic GUI (maybe over an ATCP/GMPC standard)... We had made some progress on the Mushclient forums concerning the latter last year, but then the mudstandards.org-mess disrupted that development ...
by xtian
Wed Mar 16, 2011 4:11 pm
Forum: Mudlet Development
Topic: MXP
Replies: 23
Views: 8478

Re: MXP

But now you support ATCP, are you still planning to use the OOB MXP? I already do. The advantage is that ATCP still needs special parsing on the client-side (plugins!) and with MXP (MXP-OOB) I can write to the client-side stored MXP-variable. And CMUD can directly display a MXP gauge for that varia...
by xtian
Wed Mar 16, 2011 3:28 pm
Forum: Mudlet Development
Topic: MXP
Replies: 23
Views: 8478

Re: MXP

version 1.2 added out-of-band transport over telnet subchannels. Do any clients other than CMUD support that though? Not to my knowledge. It is still a fairly new addition and was added (on my request, btw) just before ATCP became widely accepted (on the client-front) an work on GMCP started. So no...
by xtian
Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:56 pm
Forum: Mudlet Development
Topic: MXP
Replies: 23
Views: 8478

Re: MXP

You'll find that Cmud implements yet a different dialect of MXP... I remember running into some compatibility problems a while back. Well, let's put rumours aside, because I think these issues have already been addressed in the past and are just rumour-residues now. There are always bugs, aren't th...
by xtian
Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:38 pm
Forum: Mudlet Development
Topic: MXP
Replies: 23
Views: 8478

Re: MXP

Hm, you can probably inquire with Zugg. Here are some quickly collected links (you need access to his developer forums - register with site->groups): New in 1.2 - subchannel communication: http://forums.zuggsoft.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=34260 New in 1.2 - <REPORT>: http://forums.zuggsoft.com/forum...
by xtian
Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:51 pm
Forum: Mudlet Development
Topic: MXP
Replies: 23
Views: 8478

Re: MXP

Note: KaVir mentioned the <SUPPORT> tag. Not all the MXP features can be disabled/enabled that way. Some features are compulsory per the standard. Obviously some implementations differ (which didn't help the mud servers adopt the standard). I try to get an indication of the compatible non-tag featur...
by xtian
Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:23 am
Forum: Mudlet Development
Topic: mudlet TTYPE policy
Replies: 2
Views: 1359

mudlet TTYPE policy

At the moment mudlet sends a TTYPE of "Mudlet 1.0". This is wonderful as it is the first client to encode the version into the TTYPE thus using it at is was intended. But I (and I guess must other muds) will need to adapt their client identification code, so it might be useful to publicly write down...